I feel your ideas.time.com source is acceptable and a credible source. The publisher of the article (Time magazine) is certainly credible as they have been one of the head honchos in the magazine industry for over 100 years. The author of the article does have the credentials to use his words in your paper because he is a professor of psychology and criminal justice at Texas A&M. I have no reason to believe the article's content isn't accurate due to the credibility of the author. The article is fresh and up to date. There is a small portion of bias present but it doesn't distract from the author's purpose. The author's audience is appropriate, as is there purpose. All in all, this is a valid source.
I feel your ideas.time.com source is acceptable and a credible source. The publisher of the article (Time magazine) is certainly credible as they have been one of the head honchos in the magazine industry for over 100 years. The author of the article does have the credentials to use his words in your paper because he is a professor of psychology and criminal justice at Texas A&M. I have no reason to believe the article's content isn't accurate due to the credibility of the author. The article is fresh and up to date. There is a small portion of bias present but it doesn't distract from the author's purpose. The author's audience is appropriate, as is there purpose. All in all, this is a valid source.
ReplyDelete